Toolkit resource
A Community Discussion Guide for Evaluating Claims
A ninety-minute facilitation guide for running a claim-evaluation discussion in a library, congregation, or community group without it becoming an argument.
Community organizations reach people who will never attend a workshop about information. That reach is the asset, and it works best when the session is attached to something the group already does.
Nonprofits tend to use this material in two ways, and they need different things.
With the people you serve. Thecommunity discussion guide is a complete ninety-minute session. It works best attached to an existing gathering rather than promoted as a standalone event, because the people who most benefit are rarely the people who sign up for a workshop about information.
Internally, on your own decisions. Theassumption audit worksheet is designed for a team examining a conclusion it has already reached, such as why a campaign underperformed or whether a programme is working. This is where the reasoning tools do the most immediate good, and it is the use organizations most often overlook.
Pick something checkable, currently circulating, and not tied to a live local dispute. Consumer, health, and local-service claims work far better than political ones for a first session. Verify it fully yourself beforehand, including whichever way it resolves, and be prepared for the answer to be "it is more complicated than either side says", which is the most instructive outcome.
Six headline classifications before and after a session, three reliable and three not, take five minutes and produce a defensible pre and post measure for your own population. Published studies cannot answer a funder's question about your community. Your own five-minute measure can.
Our evidence review states plainly what the research supports and what it does not, which is useful when writing a proposal that has to be honest about expected effects.
Toolkit resource
A ninety-minute facilitation guide for running a claim-evaluation discussion in a library, congregation, or community group without it becoming an argument.
Report
A short evidence review for libraries, schools, and community organizations planning free media literacy sessions, with confidence levels attached to each finding.
Toolkit resource
A one-page checklist of seven questions to run before forwarding content, sized for printing, pinning, or saving to a phone.
Toolkit resource
A five-step worksheet for locating the assumption a conclusion cannot survive without, rather than listing every assumption it makes.
Think Lab
Find the load-bearing assumption in two everyday organizational conclusions, and see why the obvious candidate is often not it.
Think Lab
Practice identifying the specific missing piece that makes a statistic or a quotation uninterpretable.
Lesson
A thirty-second checklist that catches most of the content people later regret passing along, without requiring you to become a fact checker.
See the For Communities overview for the design principles behind every guide here, and for the other settings this material has been adapted to.