Toolkit resource
A Community Discussion Guide for Evaluating Claims
A ninety-minute facilitation guide for running a claim-evaluation discussion in a library, congregation, or community group without it becoming an argument.
Separating what is observed, what is inferred, what is assumed, and how confident to be.
Critical thinking here means a small set of habits you can apply to any claim. Name the claim precisely. Ask what evidence would support it and what evidence would undercut it. Distinguish an observation from an interpretation. Notice which assumptions are doing the work. Then hold a level of confidence that matches what you actually have.
This page collects everything published under critical thinking: 4 lessons, 4 practice exercises, and 4 printable resources, alongside any articles and reports that draw on it.
Toolkit resource
A ninety-minute facilitation guide for running a claim-evaluation discussion in a library, congregation, or community group without it becoming an argument.
Think Lab
Practice naming the specific observation that would reduce your confidence, which is the fastest route out of a stuck disagreement.
Think Lab
Practice reading three headlines for what they establish, what they imply, and what they leave for the article to prove.
Showing all 14 items.
Toolkit resource
A ninety-minute facilitation guide for running a claim-evaluation discussion in a library, congregation, or community group without it becoming an argument.
Article
Confidence language, what it should be based on, and how to say what you believe in a way that can be checked later.
Think Lab
Practice naming the specific observation that would reduce your confidence, which is the fastest route out of a stuck disagreement.
Toolkit resource
A five-step worksheet for locating the assumption a conclusion cannot survive without, rather than listing every assumption it makes.
Think Lab
Find the load-bearing assumption in two everyday organizational conclusions, and see why the obvious candidate is often not it.
Think Lab
Practice reading three headlines for what they establish, what they imply, and what they leave for the article to prove.
Lesson
A repeatable six-pass method for reading a news story: claim, sourcing, evidence, framing, omissions, and confidence.
Toolkit resource
A printable card summarizing the six-pass method for reading a news story, with the question each pass asks.
Article
A structured way to generate alternative explanations before settling on one, adapted from analysis of competing hypotheses for everyday use.
Lesson
What confirmation bias is, the three distinct behaviours it covers, and the small number of countermeasures that survive contact with real evidence.
Toolkit resource
A four-column worksheet for taking apart a paragraph of argument and locating where a disagreement actually sits.
Think Lab
Sort three statements about the same event into observation, inference, assumption, and value judgment.
Lesson
How to tell an observation from an interpretation from a value judgment, and why mixing them is the most common reasoning error in public argument.
Lesson
Four specific reasons two things can move together without one causing the other, and the questions that tell them apart in practice.
No items match those filters. Clear one filter to see more, orsearch the whole site.
Return to the Learn overview orfollow the guided starting path.