Spot the Missing Context
What you will be able to do: Identifying which specific omission makes a claim uninterpretable, rather than noting vaguely that context is missing
Before you start
Saying “this lacks context” is easy and rarely changes anything. Saying which piece of context is missing, and what it would settle, is the skill.
These two items present a statistic and a quotation. In each case, several things are missing. Only one of them is load bearing.
Every scenario on this page is fictional and was written for this exercise. None of them describes a real organization, person, or event.
Practice
Choose a response for each item, then read why it is stronger or weaker. There is no score, no account, and nothing is sent anywhere. Your answers stay in this browser tab and disappear when you close it.
1. A statistic without a baseline
A post states: "Emergency room visits at the county hospital rose 18 percent last quarter."
Strongest reading
This is the strongest answer. Eighteen percent above the previous quarter, the same quarter last year, or a five-year average are three different claims, and seasonal services vary enormously by quarter. Without the comparison, the number cannot be interpreted at all.
Partly right
Important and worth having. An 18 percent rise from 50 to 59 visits is a different story from 5,000 to 5,900. But without knowing the comparison period, the absolute numbers still would not tell you whether anything unusual occurred.
Weaker reading
This jumps past the question of whether there is an increase to be explained. Establish the measurement before reaching for the mechanism.
Show the full answer key for this item
What remains uncertain: Even with a baseline, a single quarter is a short series. Quarter-to-quarter variation in health services is often large enough that an 18 percent move is within normal fluctuation.
- What the comparison quarter is. Strongest reading
- This is the strongest answer. Eighteen percent above the previous quarter, the same quarter last year, or a five-year average are three different claims, and seasonal services vary enormously by quarter. Without the comparison, the number cannot be interpreted at all.
- The absolute number of visits. Partly right
- Important and worth having. An 18 percent rise from 50 to 59 visits is a different story from 5,000 to 5,900. But without knowing the comparison period, the absolute numbers still would not tell you whether anything unusual occurred.
- The cause of the increase. Weaker reading
- This jumps past the question of whether there is an increase to be explained. Establish the measurement before reaching for the mechanism.
2. A quotation with the surroundings removed
A graphic circulates showing a school board member saying: "We do not need to consult parents on this."
Strongest reading
Strongest. The immediate context establishes what "this" refers to, whether the sentence was a statement of position or a restatement of someone else's, and whether a qualification followed. Nearly all quote-based controversies resolve at this step.
Weaker reading
This shifts from evaluating the quote to evaluating the person. A pattern is relevant background, but it cannot establish what this particular sentence meant, and it makes it easy to accept a distorted quote because it fits an expectation.
Partly right
Genuinely useful, and often the fastest thing to check, since recirculated old material is common. But if the quote is current and still cropped, the date alone will not tell you what was meant.
Show the full answer key for this item
What remains uncertain: Full context sometimes confirms the impression the crop created. Checking context is not the same as assuming the crop was unfair.
- The full recording or transcript of the surrounding exchange. Strongest reading
- Strongest. The immediate context establishes what "this" refers to, whether the sentence was a statement of position or a restatement of someone else's, and whether a qualification followed. Nearly all quote-based controversies resolve at this step.
- Knowing whether the person has said similar things before. Weaker reading
- This shifts from evaluating the quote to evaluating the person. A pattern is relevant background, but it cannot establish what this particular sentence meant, and it makes it easy to accept a distorted quote because it fits an expectation.
- The date of the meeting. Partly right
- Genuinely useful, and often the fastest thing to check, since recirculated old material is common. But if the quote is current and still cropped, the date alone will not tell you what was meant.
What to take away
- A number without a baseline is not yet information.
- Before asking why something changed, establish what it changed relative to.
- Quotations need the sentence around them, not the person's history.
- Reaching for what someone has said before is a substitute for finding out what they said this time.
- Dates are cheap to check and frequently decisive.
- Recirculated old material requires no manipulation and is among the most common forms of misleading content.
Nothing you select on this page is transmitted anywhere. There is no account, no score, and no record. See the privacy page for details.
Topics covered: Information ManipulationMedia Literacy
Related material
Toolkit resource
Seven Questions Before You Share: Printable Checklist
A one-page checklist of seven questions to run before forwarding content, sized for printing, pinning, or saving to a phone.
Lesson
How Images Lose Their Original Context
Recontextualized photographs mislead more often than manipulated ones. Here is how it happens and how to trace an image back to its origin.
Lesson
Seven Questions to Ask Before You Share
A thirty-second checklist that catches most of the content people later regret passing along, without requiring you to become a fact checker.
How this page is produced
Published by ARAC International under theTHINK editorial standards. If you find an error, please tell us through the corrections page.