Think Lab
Analyze a Headline
Practice reading three headlines for what they establish, what they imply, and what they leave for the article to prove.
Reading about a skill and using it are different things. These six exercises give you something to decide, then show the reasoning behind each option.
Each exercise presents a short scenario and asks what you would conclude. Once you choose, you see why that response is stronger or weaker than the others. Nothing is marked right or wrong, because in most of these cases more than one answer is defensible and the useful information is in the reasoning.
Every option has an explanation, including the weak ones, and every item ends with a note on what remains uncertain even after the exercise. If a scenario looks like it should have a clean answer and does not, that is usually the point being made.
Practice reading three headlines for what they establish, what they imply, and what they leave for the article to prove.
Skill practised: Reading a headline for its precise claim, separating what it establishes from what it merely implies. About 8 minutes.
Practice lateral reading on a fictional organization: what to do first, and how a funding finding should change your reading.
Skill practised: Lateral reading: judging an unfamiliar publisher using independent sources rather than the publisher's own account. About 8 minutes.
Practice identifying the specific missing piece that makes a statistic or a quotation uninterpretable.
Skill practised: Identifying which specific omission makes a claim uninterpretable, rather than noting vaguely that context is missing. About 7 minutes.
Sort three statements about the same event into observation, inference, assumption, and value judgment.
Skill practised: Classifying statements as observation, inference, assumption, or value judgment, and splitting sentences that mix them. About 8 minutes.
Find the load-bearing assumption in two everyday organizational conclusions, and see why the obvious candidate is often not it.
Skill practised: Identifying which unstated assumption a conclusion actually depends on. About 8 minutes.
Practice naming the specific observation that would reduce your confidence, which is the fastest route out of a stuck disagreement.
Skill practised: Naming a specific, obtainable observation that would lower your confidence in a position you hold. About 8 minutes.
The exercises work well in a session where participants complete one individually, then compare answers in threes. The disagreements are more instructive than the explanations. For a full session plan, see thecommunity discussion guideor the For Communities pages.
If you would rather read first, the lessons cover the same material in explanatory form, and each exercise links to its matching lesson.
Think Lab
Practice reading three headlines for what they establish, what they imply, and what they leave for the article to prove.
Think Lab
Practice lateral reading on a fictional organization: what to do first, and how a funding finding should change your reading.
Think Lab
Practice identifying the specific missing piece that makes a statistic or a quotation uninterpretable.
Think Lab
Sort three statements about the same event into observation, inference, assumption, and value judgment.
Think Lab
Find the load-bearing assumption in two everyday organizational conclusions, and see why the obvious candidate is often not it.
Think Lab
Practice naming the specific observation that would reduce your confidence, which is the fastest route out of a stuck disagreement.